PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHK vs. PPFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PHK vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PHK vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHK
PIMCO High Income Fund
-1.88%12.63%9.46%18.84%-14.41%10.97%-10.10%3.44%20.86%-10.23%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
1.35%7.45%4.29%7.54%1.84%14.93%3.32%8.75%-5.38%10.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHK achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than PPFIX's 1.35% return.


PHK

1D
4.28%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
4.73%

PPFIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.35%
6M
3.55%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHK vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHK
PHK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFIX
PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHK vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHKPPFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.66

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

2.04

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.34

-1.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.90

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.01

14.59

-11.58

PHK vs. PPFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHK Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the PPFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHK and PPFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHKPPFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.66

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.57

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.80

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between PHK and PPFIX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PHK vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison

PHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than PPFIX's 5.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHK
PIMCO High Income Fund
12.44%11.85%11.85%11.54%12.18%9.37%10.62%10.57%12.09%13.29%13.54%16.98%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
5.62%5.62%6.24%6.86%1.92%7.16%0.44%0.23%0.93%2.68%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PHK vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHK drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, which is greater than PPFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHK and PPFIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PHKPPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.29%

-15.64%

-59.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-2.77%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-4.49%

-22.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-0.07%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-1.37%

-8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

0.47%

+1.88%

Volatility

PHK vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.33%. This indicates that PHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PHKPPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

0.33%

+7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

0.67%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

3.59%

+9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

3.87%

+10.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

7.18%

+13.46%