PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHDG vs. CLSE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and CLSE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PHDG vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.82%
7.35%
PHDG
CLSE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHDG:

1.20

CLSE:

2.62

Sortino Ratio

PHDG:

1.82

CLSE:

3.58

Omega Ratio

PHDG:

1.23

CLSE:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

PHDG:

1.32

CLSE:

4.69

Martin Ratio

PHDG:

5.65

CLSE:

18.17

Ulcer Index

PHDG:

2.29%

CLSE:

1.91%

Daily Std Dev

PHDG:

10.76%

CLSE:

13.26%

Max Drawdown

PHDG:

-17.70%

CLSE:

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

PHDG:

-3.24%

CLSE:

-3.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 35.84% return.


PHDG

YTD

12.56%

1M

-0.08%

6M

1.82%

1Y

13.86%

5Y*

7.64%

10Y*

4.76%

CLSE

YTD

35.84%

1M

-2.17%

6M

7.35%

1Y

35.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PHDG vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for PHDG: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHDG vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHDG, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.202.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHDG, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.823.58
The chart of Omega ratio for PHDG, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.231.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHDG, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.114.69
The chart of Martin ratio for PHDG, currently valued at 5.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.6518.17
PHDG
CLSE

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.20
2.62
PHDG
CLSE

Dividends

PHDG vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF
1.46%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.65%5.45%1.76%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and CLSE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.24%
-3.91%
PHDG
CLSE

Volatility

PHDG vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is 3.69%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that PHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.69%
5.40%
PHDG
CLSE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab