PHD vs. CLOZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ).

CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023.

Performance

PHD vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHD vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PHD Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc.	2,387.50%	-95.64%	16.93%	14.92%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	-1.42%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHD achieves a 2,387.50% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.42% return.

PHD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 2,387.50%
• 6M: -0.10%
• 1Y: 8.41%
• 3Y*: 14.05%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: -1.42%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 9.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHD vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHD

PHD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PHD Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PHD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHD vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHD	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	0.85	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	64.63	1.13	+63.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	23.85	1.24	+22.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	1.23	-1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.43	3.89	-3.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHD vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHD and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHD	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	0.85	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	2.55	-2.54

Correlation

The correlation between PHD and CLOZ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHD vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

PHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than CLOZ's 7.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHD Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc.	3.02%	131.25%	10.36%	11.91%	9.75%	6.24%	6.67%	7.29%	6.71%	6.28%	6.13%	6.50%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.93%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PHD vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHD drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHD and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHD	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.00%	-5.32%	-90.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.00%	-3.90%	-92.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-2.66%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-0.37%	-9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.20%	1.23%	+15.97%

Volatility

PHD vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) has a higher volatility of 658.65% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.37%. This indicates that PHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHD	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	658.65%	1.37%	+657.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1,020.37%	2.94%	+1,017.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6,380.53%	5.50%	+6,375.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2,469.50%	3.83%	+2,465.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,717.93%	3.83%	+1,714.10%