PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHD vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, PHD has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -22.88%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


PHD

1D
-95.98%
1M
-95.98%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
-95.85%
3Y*
-60.81%
5Y*
-44.55%
10Y*
-22.88%

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHD
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc.
-0.00%-95.64%16.93%18.20%-17.24%21.32%-0.22%20.28%-8.94%2.66%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PHD and ^GSPC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2004

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between PHD and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHD vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHD
PHD Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHD Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHD^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

2.24

-2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

32.69

3.07

+29.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

16.19

1.41

+14.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.03

2.93

-3.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-3.03

13.52

-16.55

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHD Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHD and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHD^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

2.24

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.73

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.76

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.47

-0.49

Drawdowns

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHD drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHD and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHD^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-56.78%

-39.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.00%

-9.10%

-86.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.00%

-18.90%

-77.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.00%

-25.43%

-70.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.00%

-33.92%

-62.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.00%

-0.74%

-95.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-10.72%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.10%

1.97%

+25.13%

Volatility

PHD vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Floating Rate Fund, Inc. (PHD) has a higher volatility of 565.86% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that PHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHD^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

565.86%

2.93%

+562.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

720.94%

8.99%

+711.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4,070.94%

11.89%

+4,059.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,564.39%

16.90%

+1,547.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,087.64%

18.06%

+1,069.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHD and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHD has higher volatility (565.86%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHD dropped -96.00% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHD and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer