PHB vs. SJNK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Fundamental High Yield® Corporate Bond ETF (PHB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK).
PHB and SJNK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PHB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the RAFI Bonds US High Yield 1-10 Index. It was launched on Nov 15, 2007. SJNK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y). It was launched on Mar 15, 2012. Both PHB and SJNK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHB or SJNK.
Key characteristics
| PHB | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.37% | 5.92% |
| 1Y Return | 11.63% | 10.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.30% | 3.99% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.55% | 4.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.76% | 3.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.38 | 2.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.92% | 4.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.79% | -19.74% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHB and SJNK is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PHB vs. SJNK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PHB achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly lower than SJNK's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PHB has underperformed SJNK with an annualized return of 3.76%, while SJNK has yielded a comparatively higher 3.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHB vs. SJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SJNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHB vs. SJNK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental High Yield® Corporate Bond ETF (PHB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PHB vs. SJNK - Dividend Comparison
PHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than SJNK's 7.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHB Invesco Fundamental High Yield® Corporate Bond ETF | 5.48% | 4.68% | 3.52% | 3.37% | 3.90% | 4.03% | 4.44% | 4.14% | 4.58% | 4.69% | 4.48% | 4.63% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% | 5.46% | 5.34% |
Drawdowns
PHB vs. SJNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHB drawdown since its inception was -44.79%, which is greater than SJNK's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHB and SJNK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PHB vs. SJNK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Fundamental High Yield® Corporate Bond ETF (PHB) is 1.00%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that PHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.