PH vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PH or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between PH and COST is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PH vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PH:
1.76
COST:
2.60
PH:
2.72
COST:
3.20
PH:
1.36
COST:
1.46
PH:
4.03
COST:
4.72
PH:
11.01
COST:
12.17
PH:
4.14%
COST:
3.98%
PH:
25.93%
COST:
18.66%
PH:
-66.92%
COST:
-53.39%
PH:
-8.61%
COST:
-4.08%
Fundamentals
PH:
$85.73B
COST:
$435.99B
PH:
$22.18
COST:
$16.98
PH:
30.03
COST:
57.84
PH:
2.80
COST:
5.99
PH:
$19.99B
COST:
$258.81B
PH:
$7.20B
COST:
$32.80B
PH:
$4.95B
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 42.03% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 19.40%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.
PH
42.03%
-6.26%
29.03%
43.52%
27.58%
19.40%
COST
45.38%
2.80%
12.78%
47.55%
28.68%
23.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PH vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PH vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than COST's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.98% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% | 1.61% | 1.38% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
PH vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PH vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that PH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PH vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities