PGTQX vs. FADMX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX).
PGTQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Feb 3, 2012. FADMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994.
Performance
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | -1.60% | 11.14% | 0.31% | 8.46% | -22.33% | -5.95% | 10.07% | 15.22% | -1.66% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | -0.31% | 9.01% | 6.07% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -2.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTQX achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's -0.31% return.
PGTQX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTQX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTQX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTQX
FADMX
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTQX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 2.20 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 3.08 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.13 | -1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 12.17 | -6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTQX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.20 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.65 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.79 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTQX and FADMX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison
PGTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than FADMX's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | 3.70% | 4.00% | 4.47% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.94% | 8.65% | 3.63% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.85% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.04% | 4.33% | 4.21% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTQX drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTQX and FADMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTQX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.72% | -15.98% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -2.62% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -15.98% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.24% | -2.04% | -26.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -3.12% | -16.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.67% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PGTQX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) at 1.69%. This indicates that PGTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTQX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 1.69% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 2.44% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 3.58% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 4.44% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 4.77% | +16.74% |