PGTI vs. BULZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGT Innovations, Inc. (PGTI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).

BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.

Performance

PGTI vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGT Innovations, Inc. (PGTI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PGTI vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PGTI PGT Innovations, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	3.17%	126.61%	-20.14%	9.44%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	-28.68%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	12.62%

Returns By Period

PGTI

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULZ

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: -12.77%
• YTD: -28.68%
• 6M: -31.57%
• 1Y: 72.81%
• 3Y*: 59.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PGTI vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTI vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGT Innovations, Inc. (PGTI) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGTI	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.06	—

Correlation

The correlation between PGTI and BULZ is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PGTI vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PGTI nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PGTI	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-94.44%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-54.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-46.52%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-60.15%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	20.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PGTI	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	60.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	92.48%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	91.56%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	91.56%	—