PGNY vs. NNOX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX).

Performance

PGNY vs. NNOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PGNY vs. NNOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PGNY Progyny, Inc.	-34.35%	48.87%	-53.60%	19.36%	-38.13%	18.78%	44.28%
NNOX Nano-X Imaging Ltd.	-13.93%	-61.11%	13.03%	-13.69%	-49.24%	-68.16%	110.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PGNY : $1.51B NNOX : $155.02M
EPS PGNY : $0.65 NNOX : -$0.87
PS Ratio PGNY : 1.17 NNOX : 12.56
PB Ratio PGNY : 2.92 NNOX : 0.99
Total Revenue (TTM) PGNY : $1.29B NNOX : $12.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) PGNY : $304.48M NNOX : -$12.16M
EBITDA (TTM) PGNY : $94.01M NNOX : -$44.73M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGNY achieves a -34.35% return, which is significantly lower than NNOX's -13.93% return.

PGNY

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: -34.35%
• 6M: -20.55%
• 1Y: -26.98%
• 3Y*: -19.33%
• 5Y*: -18.06%
• 10Y*: —

NNOX

• 1D: 6.17%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: -13.93%
• 6M: -34.69%
• 1Y: -50.10%
• 3Y*: -25.25%
• 5Y*: -43.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PGNY vs. NNOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNY

PGNY Risk / Return Rank: 16
PGNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PGNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PGNY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PGNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PGNY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

NNOX

NNOX Risk / Return Rank: 10
NNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
NNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
NNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
NNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNY vs. NNOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGNY	NNOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.74	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	-1.12	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.89	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	-0.83	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	-1.46	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGNY vs. NNOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is comparable to the NNOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNY and NNOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGNY	NNOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	-0.74	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	-0.48	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.32	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between PGNY and NNOX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PGNY vs. NNOX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PGNY nor NNOX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PGNY vs. NNOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNY drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum NNOX drawdown of -97.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNY and NNOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGNY	NNOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.49%	-97.61%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.68%	-62.52%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.49%	-95.59%	+16.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.71%	-97.30%	+22.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.67%	-82.16%	+40.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.91%	35.44%	-19.53%

Volatility

PGNY vs. NNOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) is 7.85%, while Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) has a volatility of 13.77%. This indicates that PGNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NNOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGNY	NNOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.85%	13.77%	-5.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.44%	53.48%	-10.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.03%	67.96%	-15.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.34%	89.71%	-34.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.74%	100.88%	-39.14%

Financials