PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNY vs. ASA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGNY vs. ASA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGNY achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than ASA's 4.37% return.


PGNY

1D
1.96%
1M
34.25%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
5.51%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
-14.06%
5Y*
-16.62%
10Y*

ASA

1D
2.47%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
4.37%
6M
17.75%
1Y
82.80%
3Y*
58.37%
5Y*
21.14%
10Y*
17.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNY vs. ASA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.
-0.78%48.87%-53.60%19.36%-38.13%18.78%54.43%72.21%
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
4.37%195.60%34.55%5.38%-32.06%-3.48%60.65%8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNY and ASA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2019

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PGNY:

$2.16B

ASA:

$1.17B

EPS

PGNY:

$0.76

ASA:

$42.09

PE Ratio

PGNY:

33.32

ASA:

1.48

PEG Ratio

PGNY:

2.80

ASA:

0.00

PS Ratio

PGNY:

1.74

ASA:

8.54

PB Ratio

PGNY:

4.92

ASA:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGNY:

$1.29B

ASA:

$137.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGNY:

$311.76M

ASA:

$3.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

PGNY:

$108.11M

ASA:

$444.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNY vs. ASA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNY
PGNY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PGNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ASA
ASA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNY vs. ASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGNYASADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

2.56

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

6.90

-5.91

PGNY vs. ASA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ASA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNY and ASA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGNYASADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

1.75

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.60

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.16

-0.05

Drawdowns

PGNY vs. ASA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNY drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ASA drawdown of -80.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNY and ASA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNYASADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-80.36%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

-32.51%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.14%

-32.51%

-35.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.49%

-51.33%

-28.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.78%

-23.39%

-38.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.39%

-42.54%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.86%

12.04%

+7.82%

Volatility

PGNY vs. ASA - Volatility Comparison

Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) has a higher volatility of 24.13% compared to ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) at 15.59%. This indicates that PGNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNYASADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.13%

15.59%

+8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.53%

39.17%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.99%

47.50%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.07%

35.15%

+20.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.88%

35.36%

+26.52%

Dividends

PGNY vs. ASA - Dividend Comparison

PGNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
0.11%0.10%0.20%0.13%0.14%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.32%0.35%0.36%0.56%
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PGNY vs. ASA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progyny, Inc. and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
328.50M
133.95M
(PGNY) Total Revenue
(ASA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNY and ASA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGNY has higher volatility (24.13%) compared to ASA (15.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNY dropped -79.49% vs ASA's -80.36%.

ASA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNY and ASA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer