PGNY vs. ASA
PGNY (Progyny, Inc.) and ASA (ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited) are both stocks. PGNY operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while ASA operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, PGNY returned -14.39%/yr vs 19.58%/yr for ASA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PGNY vs. ASA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGNY achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than ASA's -11.27% return.
PGNY
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 30.94%
- 3Y*
- -9.70%
- 5Y*
- -14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ASA
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -15.32%
- YTD
- -11.27%
- 6M
- -13.72%
- 1Y
- 68.45%
- 3Y*
- 52.76%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
PGNY vs. ASA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGNY Progyny, Inc. | 6.62% | 48.87% | -53.60% | 19.36% | -38.13% | 18.78% | 54.43% | 103.33% |
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited | -11.27% | 195.60% | 34.55% | 5.38% | -32.06% | -3.48% | 60.65% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGNY and ASA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
PGNY:
$2.32B
ASA:
$994.07M
PGNY:
$0.76
ASA:
$42.09
PGNY:
35.80
ASA:
1.26
PGNY:
3.01
ASA:
0.00
PGNY:
1.87
ASA:
7.26
PGNY:
5.28
ASA:
0.90
PGNY:
$1.29B
ASA:
$137.30M
PGNY:
$311.76M
ASA:
$3.98M
PGNY:
$108.11M
ASA:
$444.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGNY vs. ASA — Risk / Return Rank
PGNY
ASA
PGNY vs. ASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGNY | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.94 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 4.96 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGNY vs. ASA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGNY drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ASA drawdown of -80.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNY and ASA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGNY | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -80.36% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.65% | -35.50% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | -35.50% | -32.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.49% | -48.43% | -31.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.93% | -34.87% | -24.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.51% | -42.52% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.90% | 13.85% | +6.05% |
Volatility
PGNY vs. ASA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) is 7.68%, while ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a volatility of 17.67%. This indicates that PGNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGNY | ASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 17.67% | -9.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.35% | 41.30% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.72% | 49.55% | +7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.05% | 35.66% | +20.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.03% | 35.62% | +26.41% |
Dividends
PGNY vs. ASA - Dividend Comparison
PGNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited | 0.13% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.56% |
PGNY Progyny, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PGNY vs. ASA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Progyny, Inc. and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PGNY and ASA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASA has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to PGNY (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNY dropped -79.49% vs ASA's -80.36%.
ASA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGNY and ASA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer