PGJ vs. SPY
PGJ (Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGJ is a China Equities fund tracking the Halter USX China Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGJ returned 0.64%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPY. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGJ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
PGJ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a -8.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJ has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 0.64%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
PGJ
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -8.75%
- 6M
- -12.02%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -13.04%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
PGJ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | -8.75% | 13.66% | 5.91% | -2.38% | -24.50% | -42.87% | 54.24% | 32.18% | -29.51% | 60.27% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGJ and SPY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PGJ and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PGJ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGJ
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
PGJ
SPY
Technology
PGJ
SPY
Communication Services
PGJ
SPY
Consumer Defensive
PGJ
SPY
Industrials
PGJ
SPY
Financial Services
PGJ
SPY
Real Estate
PGJ
SPY
Energy
PGJ
SPY
Healthcare
PGJ
SPY
Basic Materials
PGJ
-
SPY
Utilities
PGJ
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGJ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
PGJ
SPY
PGJ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 2.52 | -2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | 3.42 | -3.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.46 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.42 | -3.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 15.93 | -16.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 2.52 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.84 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.87 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.59 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
PGJ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.37% | -55.19% | -23.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -8.88% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.82% | -18.76% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.00% | -24.50% | -45.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.37% | -33.72% | -44.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.21% | 0.00% | -65.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.73% | -9.05% | -22.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.32% | 1.91% | +11.41% |
Volatility
PGJ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that PGJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 2.75% | +5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 8.89% | +8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 11.81% | +12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 17.05% | +26.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 17.94% | +18.76% |
PGJ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGJ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 3.47% | 3.38% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGJ and SPY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGJ has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGJ dropped -78.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 0.64% for PGJ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PGJ.
PGJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.
PGJ is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. PGJ tracks Halter USX China Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PGJ and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGJ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer