PGJ vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
PGJ and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PGJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Halter USX China Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2004. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both PGJ and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PGJ or CNYA.
Correlation
The correlation between PGJ and CNYA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PGJ vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PGJ:
0.43
CNYA:
0.24
PGJ:
0.90
CNYA:
0.58
PGJ:
1.11
CNYA:
1.09
PGJ:
0.22
CNYA:
0.17
PGJ:
1.15
CNYA:
0.44
PGJ:
14.29%
CNYA:
18.51%
PGJ:
38.53%
CNYA:
33.91%
PGJ:
-78.37%
CNYA:
-49.48%
PGJ:
-65.18%
CNYA:
-38.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's -2.33% return.
PGJ
3.80%
-11.93%
1.65%
11.56%
-6.16%
-0.83%
CNYA
-2.33%
-3.85%
-5.64%
5.91%
1.24%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGJ vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PGJ vs. CNYA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PGJ
CNYA
PGJ vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PGJ vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than CNYA's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 4.81% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% | 0.89% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 2.57% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PGJ vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PGJ vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has a higher volatility of 15.02% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 10.73%. This indicates that PGJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.