PFRL vs. HIPS

In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than HIPS's -2.70% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than HIPS's 3.19% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the HIPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and HIPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PFRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%.

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum HIPS drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and HIPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.80%, while GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.