PortfoliosLab logo
PFLT vs. WPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PFLT and WPC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PFLT vs. WPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
172.48%
293.62%
PFLT
WPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PFLT:

-0.14

WPC:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

PFLT:

-0.00

WPC:

0.94

Omega Ratio

PFLT:

1.00

WPC:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

PFLT:

-0.11

WPC:

0.40

Martin Ratio

PFLT:

-0.36

WPC:

1.64

Ulcer Index

PFLT:

5.79%

WPC:

7.34%

Daily Std Dev

PFLT:

20.33%

WPC:

21.24%

Max Drawdown

PFLT:

-69.77%

WPC:

-52.45%

Current Drawdown

PFLT:

-10.78%

WPC:

-17.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PFLT:

$894.51M

WPC:

$13.47B

EPS

PFLT:

$1.37

WPC:

$1.94

PE Ratio

PFLT:

7.42

WPC:

31.71

PEG Ratio

PFLT:

0.27

WPC:

0.00

PS Ratio

PFLT:

4.11

WPC:

8.44

PB Ratio

PFLT:

0.93

WPC:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFLT:

$110.90M

WPC:

$1.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFLT:

$133.72M

WPC:

$1.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFLT:

$84.00M

WPC:

$1.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLT achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than WPC's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PFLT has outperformed WPC with an annualized return of 6.69%, while WPC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.


PFLT

YTD

-4.14%

1M

10.99%

6M

-5.37%

1Y

-2.85%

5Y*

20.27%

10Y*

6.69%

WPC

YTD

13.17%

1M

8.30%

6M

12.50%

1Y

13.68%

5Y*

5.91%

10Y*

5.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFLT vs. WPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFLT is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

WPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WPC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WPC is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WPC is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WPC is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WPC is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PFLT vs. WPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PFLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the WPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLT and WPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.14
0.65
PFLT
WPC

Dividends

PFLT vs. WPC - Dividend Comparison

PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, more than WPC's 5.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
12.20%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
5.78%6.41%6.17%5.43%5.12%5.91%5.17%6.26%5.82%6.65%6.48%5.26%

Drawdowns

PFLT vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLT drawdown since its inception was -69.77%, which is greater than WPC's maximum drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLT and WPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-10.78%
-17.85%
PFLT
WPC

Volatility

PFLT vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) at 7.77%. This indicates that PFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.80%
7.77%
PFLT
WPC

Financials

PFLT vs. WPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and W. P. Carey Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
30.01M
409.84M
(PFLT) Total Revenue
(WPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PFLT vs. WPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. and W. P. Carey Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
99.0%
93.4%
(PFLT) Gross Margin
(WPC) Gross Margin
PFLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 29.70M and revenue of 30.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.0%.

WPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. P. Carey Inc. reported a gross profit of 382.64M and revenue of 409.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.4%.

PFLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of 28.00M and revenue of 30.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.3%.

WPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. P. Carey Inc. reported an operating income of 197.47M and revenue of 409.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.2%.

PFLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a net income of 28.33M and revenue of 30.01M, resulting in a net margin of 94.4%.

WPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. P. Carey Inc. reported a net income of 125.82M and revenue of 409.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.7%.