PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLEX vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund (PFLEX) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PFLEX
PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund
-3.66%7.28%15.26%10.05%-14.68%2.02%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-8.43%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%24.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLEX achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.43% return.


PFLEX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-4.14%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*

BXSL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
-8.43%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
-20.01%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLEX vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLEX
PFLEX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PFLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund (PFLEX) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLEXBXSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

-0.85

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.26

-1.12

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.86

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

-0.81

+1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.74

-1.39

+4.13

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLEX and BXSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLEXBXSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

-0.85

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.31

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between PFLEX and BXSL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

PFLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than BXSL's 13.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PFLEX
PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund
4.30%6.59%10.51%12.77%14.50%9.06%8.51%9.86%10.59%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
13.20%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLEX drawdown since its inception was -24.60%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLEX and BXSL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLEXBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.60%

-36.80%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-23.47%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-22.27%

+17.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-13.88%

+9.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

13.69%

-12.52%

Volatility

PFLEX vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Flexible Credit Income Fund (PFLEX) is 1.04%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that PFLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFLEXBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

7.57%

-6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

15.59%

-13.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

23.65%

-19.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

23.77%

-18.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

23.77%

-17.89%