PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLD vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLD vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.


PFLD

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.69%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLD vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
2.69%1.44%5.48%8.16%-12.73%4.49%5.34%1.04%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PFLD and SPYG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019

0.41

The correlation between PFLD and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFLD vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFLD
SPYG

Utilities

100.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

8.5%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

5.0%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

51.9%

Utilities

PFLD
100.0%
SPYG
1.2%

Basic Materials

PFLD

-

SPYG
0.3%

Communication Services

PFLD

-

SPYG
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PFLD

-

SPYG
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

PFLD

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

PFLD

-

SPYG
0.1%

Financial Services

PFLD

-

SPYG
8.5%

Healthcare

PFLD

-

SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

PFLD

-

SPYG
5.0%

Real Estate

PFLD

-

SPYG
0.6%

Technology

PFLD

-

SPYG
51.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLD vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLDSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.12

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

2.90

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.48

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.46

10.25

+2.21

PFLD vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLD and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLDSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.12

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.76

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.35

-0.19

Drawdowns

PFLD vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLDSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-67.63%

+34.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-13.76%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-22.14%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

-32.67%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-24.33%

+20.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

3.32%

-2.82%

Volatility

PFLD vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 0.84%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLDSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

4.35%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

12.46%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

16.06%

-12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

21.17%

-13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.38%

20.64%

-7.26%

PFLD vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLD vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.60%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFLD and SPYG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to PFLD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFLD dropped -33.20% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.

PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

PFLD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SPYG is S&P 500. PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLD and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer