PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFGC vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PFGC vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFGC vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
-6.32%6.35%22.27%18.43%27.24%-3.61%-7.52%59.53%-2.51%37.92%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
34.50%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Fundamentals

EPS

PFGC:

$2.20

XOM:

$10.37

PE Ratio

PFGC:

38.27

XOM:

15.50

PEG Ratio

PFGC:

0.41

XOM:

0.38

PS Ratio

PFGC:

0.20

XOM:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFGC:

$65.77B

XOM:

$327.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFGC:

$7.81B

XOM:

$81.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFGC:

$1.25B

XOM:

$61.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFGC achieves a -6.32% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PFGC has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 13.61%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


PFGC

1D
-1.66%
1M
-12.09%
YTD
-6.32%
6M
-17.69%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
13.61%

XOM

1D
-5.23%
1M
4.25%
YTD
34.50%
6M
45.79%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
27.68%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFGC vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFGC
PFGC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PFGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PFGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFGC vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFGCXOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

1.57

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.53

2.04

-1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.27

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.48

-2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.69

6.44

-5.76

PFGC vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFGC and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFGCXOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

1.57

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.05

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.42

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.48

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between PFGC and XOM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PFGC vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

PFGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.51%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Drawdowns

PFGC vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFGC drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFGC and XOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFGCXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-62.40%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.47%

-15.79%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.78%

-20.51%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.85%

-61.34%

-17.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.52%

-6.23%

-16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.36%

-10.20%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.40%

6.18%

+4.22%

Volatility

PFGC vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is 8.00%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that PFGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFGCXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

8.47%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

17.04%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.53%

25.43%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.52%

26.57%

+5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

27.93%

+18.08%

Financials

PFGC vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Performance Food Group Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
16.44B
83.43B
(PFGC) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PFGC vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Performance Food Group Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
12.0%
31.4%
Portfolio components
PFGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a gross profit of 1.97B and revenue of 16.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.20B and revenue of 83.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

PFGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported an operating income of 190.10M and revenue of 16.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 9.81B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

PFGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a net income of 61.70M and revenue of 16.44B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 7.61B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.