PortfoliosLab logo
PFGC vs. XOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PFGC and XOM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PFGC vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PFGC:

0.79

XOM:

-0.22

Sortino Ratio

PFGC:

1.47

XOM:

-0.06

Omega Ratio

PFGC:

1.18

XOM:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

PFGC:

1.24

XOM:

-0.21

Martin Ratio

PFGC:

3.12

XOM:

-0.46

Ulcer Index

PFGC:

8.46%

XOM:

8.61%

Daily Std Dev

PFGC:

28.67%

XOM:

23.96%

Max Drawdown

PFGC:

-78.85%

XOM:

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

PFGC:

-3.08%

XOM:

-11.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PFGC:

$13.68B

XOM:

$471.73B

EPS

PFGC:

$2.41

XOM:

$7.47

PE Ratio

PFGC:

36.38

XOM:

14.52

PEG Ratio

PFGC:

0.67

XOM:

5.49

PS Ratio

PFGC:

0.24

XOM:

1.38

PB Ratio

PFGC:

3.15

XOM:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFGC:

$61.55B

XOM:

$341.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFGC:

$7.16B

XOM:

$84.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFGC:

$1.50B

XOM:

$73.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFGC achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 2.78% return.


PFGC

YTD

4.23%

1M

16.28%

6M

2.78%

1Y

22.37%

5Y*

32.98%

10Y*

N/A

XOM

YTD

2.78%

1M

6.29%

6M

-8.29%

1Y

-5.24%

5Y*

26.64%

10Y*

6.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PFGC vs. XOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFGC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFGC is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFGC is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFGC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFGC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFGC is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XOM is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XOM is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XOM is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XOM is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XOM is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XOM is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PFGC vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PFGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFGC and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PFGC vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

PFGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
3.61%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%2.92%

Drawdowns

PFGC vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFGC drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFGC and XOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PFGC vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 6.69%. This indicates that PFGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PFGC vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Performance Food Group Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
15.31B
83.13B
(PFGC) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PFGC vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Performance Food Group Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
11.9%
31.6%
(PFGC) Gross Margin
(XOM) Gross Margin
PFGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Performance Food Group Company reported a gross profit of 1.82B and revenue of 15.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.26B and revenue of 83.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.

PFGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Performance Food Group Company reported an operating income of 174.40M and revenue of 15.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of -14.10M and revenue of 83.13B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

PFGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Performance Food Group Company reported a net income of 58.30M and revenue of 15.31B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 7.71B and revenue of 83.13B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.