PFG vs. CSCO
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFG or CSCO.
Key characteristics
| PFG | CSCO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.06% | -2.78% |
| 1Y Return | 25.86% | 4.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.95% | -0.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.41% | 0.00% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.18% | 10.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.45 | 0.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.59% | 18.72% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.53% | -89.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.58% | -18.37% |
Fundamentals
| PFG | CSCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.68B | $194.60B |
| EPS | $5.35 | $3.29 |
| PE Ratio | 15.69 | 14.61 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.50 | 3.43 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.90B | $57.23B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $11.03B | $35.75B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.86B | $17.67B |
Correlation
The correlation between PFG and CSCO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PFG vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PFG achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly higher than CSCO's -2.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFG having a 10.18% annualized return and CSCO not far ahead at 10.51%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFG vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFG vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison
PFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than CSCO's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 3.14% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 3.37% | 4.52% | 3.96% | 4.75% | 2.65% | 2.78% | 3.33% | 2.46% | 1.99% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3.25% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% | 2.66% | 2.27% |
Drawdowns
PFG vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFG drawdown since its inception was -91.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFG and CSCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFG vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison
Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) at 4.49%. This indicates that PFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PFG vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities