PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFR vs. FDHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFR vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than FDHY's 2.46% return.


PFFR

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.55%
YTD
2.11%
6M
1.32%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*

FDHY

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFR vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
2.11%5.36%7.12%21.04%-23.90%6.76%0.19%20.28%-6.22%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
2.46%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFR and FDHY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFR vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFR
PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFR vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRFDHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.45

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.76

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

15.80

-13.38

PFFR vs. FDHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FDHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFR and FDHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFR vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than FDHY's maximum drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and FDHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRFDHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-20.01%

-33.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-2.12%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-5.26%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.80%

-16.38%

-13.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-0.18%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-2.86%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

0.50%

+2.35%

Volatility

PFFR vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) at 0.81%. This indicates that PFFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRFDHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

0.81%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.05%

2.78%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.81%

3.58%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

7.14%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

8.03%

+12.45%

PFFR vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PFFR and FDHY have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

PFFR vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison

PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than FDHY's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.50%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
8.26%7.99%7.78%7.72%8.60%6.08%6.11%5.77%6.48%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFR and FDHY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFR has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to FDHY (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs FDHY's -20.01%.

On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 3.91% vs 1.07% for PFFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFR and FDHY have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 6.50% for FDHY.

PFFR is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FDHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Fidelity.

FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFR and FDHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer