PFFD vs. FTSL
PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PFFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while FTSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. PFFD is passively managed, while FTSL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFD returned -0.16%/yr vs 5.02%/yr for FTSL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFFD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
PFFD vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 0.62% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FTSL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
PFFD vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 0.62% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and FTSL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.34 |
PFFD vs. FTSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFD
FTSL
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
PFFD
FTSL
-
Utilities
PFFD
FTSL
-
Technology
PFFD
FTSL
-
Industrials
PFFD
FTSL
-
Communication Services
PFFD
FTSL
-
Real Estate
PFFD
FTSL
-
Basic Materials
PFFD
FTSL
Consumer Cyclical
PFFD
FTSL
-
Healthcare
PFFD
FTSL
-
Consumer Defensive
PFFD
-
FTSL
-
Energy
PFFD
-
FTSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
FTSL
PFFD vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.51 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.95 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 7.25 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.15 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.50 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.85 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than FTSL's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -22.67% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -2.33% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | -2.66% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -6.96% | -17.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.03% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -0.76% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.63% | +1.38% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 0.36%. This indicates that PFFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 0.36% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 1.95% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 2.11% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 3.35% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 5.19% | +7.57% |
PFFD vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFD vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than FTSL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.46% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFD and FTSL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFD has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs FTSL's -22.67%.
On 5-year performance, FTSL leads with 5.02% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTSL has performed better with a 5.02% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 6.37% for PFFD.
PFFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FTSL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFD and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer