PFF vs. RNP
PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index, while RNP (Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PFF returned 3.30%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for RNP. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PFF vs. RNP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than RNP's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has underperformed RNP with an annualized return of 3.30%, while RNP has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.
PFF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 9.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
RNP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
PFF vs. RNP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 2.93% | 4.87% | 7.24% | 9.22% | -18.19% | 7.15% | 7.89% | 15.93% | -4.64% | 8.10% |
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 8.10% | 2.57% | 11.88% | 7.73% | -19.95% | 32.84% | 3.31% | 43.14% | -9.46% | 19.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFF and RNP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PFF and RNP shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFF vs. RNP — Risk / Return Rank
PFF
RNP
PFF vs. RNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.05 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.25 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 0.56 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.24 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.30 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
PFF vs. RNP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, smaller than the maximum RNP drawdown of -86.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and RNP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -86.93% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -12.24% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.63% | -19.71% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -36.19% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -56.68% | +22.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.97% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -13.13% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 5.43% | -3.73% |
Volatility
PFF vs. RNP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) is 2.09%, while Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that PFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFF | RNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 3.63% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 9.60% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 12.61% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 20.82% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 24.22% | -11.56% |
Dividends
PFF vs. RNP - Dividend Comparison
PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than RNP's 7.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.47% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
RNP Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. | 7.85% | 8.22% | 7.81% | 8.10% | 13.26% | 5.20% | 6.52% | 6.25% | 8.36% | 7.00% | 7.75% | 8.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFF and RNP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNP has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to PFF (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs RNP's -86.93%.
PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFF and RNP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer