PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. PFFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with PFF at 2.93% and PFFV at 2.93%.


PFF

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.34%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.41%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
3.30%

PFFV

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.93%
6M
2.88%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFF vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
2.93%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%14.11%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
2.93%2.08%9.45%10.64%-13.81%6.35%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and PFFV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.81

The correlation between PFF and PFFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFF vs. PFFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFF
PFFV

Financial Services

52.3%
72.1%

Real Estate

10.7%
19.6%

Utilities

8.9%

-

Industrials

5.5%

-

Technology

4.4%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%

-

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Energy

0.4%
1.6%

Financial Services

PFF
52.3%
PFFV
72.1%

Real Estate

PFF
10.7%
PFFV
19.6%

Utilities

PFF
8.9%
PFFV

-

Industrials

PFF
5.5%
PFFV

-

Technology

PFF
4.4%
PFFV

-

Communication Services

PFF
3.5%
PFFV

-

Basic Materials

PFF
1.6%
PFFV

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFF
1.3%
PFFV

-

Healthcare

PFF
1.3%
PFFV

-

Consumer Defensive

PFF
1.2%
PFFV

-

Energy

PFF
0.4%
PFFV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFV
PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFF vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFPFFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.61

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.51

4.52

+1.00

PFF vs. PFFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the PFFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and PFFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFPFFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.27

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.26

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.56

-0.35

Drawdowns

PFF vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and PFFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFPFFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-18.96%

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-3.23%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-6.07%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-18.96%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.31%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-4.18%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.15%

+0.55%

Volatility

PFF vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 0.79%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFPFFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

0.79%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

2.84%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.75%

4.12%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.30%

8.84%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

8.69%

+3.97%

PFF vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFF vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than PFFV's 8.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.47%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
8.12%8.26%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.23%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and PFFV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFF has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to PFFV (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs PFFV's -18.96%.

On 5-year performance, PFFV leads with 2.24% vs 1.50% for PFF. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 2.24% return vs 1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.

PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 5.47% for PFF.

PFF tracks S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index, while PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.25% for PFFV.

PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and PFFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer