PFC.NS vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFC.NS or COST.
Key characteristics
PFC.NS | COST | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 25.38% | 42.08% |
1Y Return | 58.23% | 65.88% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 75.56% | 23.55% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 51.51% | 27.30% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 22.90% | 23.65% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.71 | 3.37 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.12 | 4.00 |
Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.60 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.75 | 6.44 |
Martin Ratio | 8.02 | 16.66 |
Ulcer Index | 10.80% | 3.97% |
Daily Std Dev | 50.61% | 19.61% |
Max Drawdown | -71.96% | -53.39% |
Current Drawdown | -17.25% | -1.21% |
Fundamentals
PFC.NS | COST | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | ₹1.59T | $413.11B |
EPS | ₹62.27 | $16.61 |
PE Ratio | 7.50 | 56.13 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | ₹581.41B | $254.45B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | ₹125.40B | $32.10B |
EBITDA (TTM) | ₹247.63B | $10.63B |
Correlation
The correlation between PFC.NS and COST is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PFC.NS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PFC.NS achieves a 25.38% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 42.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFC.NS having a 22.90% annualized return and COST not far ahead at 23.65%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFC.NS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFC.NS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
PFC.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than COST's 2.09% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Finance Corporation Limited | 3.59% | 2.85% | 8.86% | 12.32% | 8.31% | 0.00% | 1.68% | 9.03% | 2.09% | 8.89% | 2.99% | 4.19% |
Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.09% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
PFC.NS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFC.NS drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFC.NS and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFC.NS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.56%. This indicates that PFC.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PFC.NS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Finance Corporation Limited and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities