PEZ vs. JOET
PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while JOET is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEZ returned 3.14%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for JOET. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JOET.
Performance
PEZ vs. JOET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than JOET's 8.43% return.
PEZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.88%
JOET
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $871.40K | $1.08M | $923.13K | |
| $60.43K | $108.59K | $64.29K |
PEZ vs. JOET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | -1.42% | 5.40% | 20.06% | 29.55% | -29.59% | 20.35% | 13.90% |
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 8.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 26.79% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEZ and JOET is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PEZ and JOET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEZ vs. JOET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEZ
JOET
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEZ
JOET
Communication Services
PEZ
JOET
Healthcare
PEZ
JOET
Consumer Defensive
PEZ
JOET
Technology
PEZ
JOET
Real Estate
PEZ
JOET
Industrials
PEZ
JOET
Financial Services
PEZ
JOET
Basic Materials
PEZ
-
JOET
Energy
PEZ
-
JOET
Utilities
PEZ
-
JOET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEZ vs. JOET — Risk / Return Rank
PEZ
JOET
PEZ vs. JOET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEZ | JOET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.11 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 4.20 | -3.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEZ vs. JOET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than JOET's maximum drawdown of -26.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and JOET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEZ | JOET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.39% | -26.58% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -10.42% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -19.55% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.72% | -26.58% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -1.61% | -7.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -7.02% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 2.75% | +3.91% |
Volatility
PEZ vs. JOET - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) at 3.12%. This indicates that PEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JOET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEZ | JOET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 3.12% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 11.02% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 14.06% | +6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 17.79% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 17.45% | +7.61% |
PEZ vs. JOET - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JOET's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEZ vs. JOET - Dividend Comparison
PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than JOET's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.83% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEZ and JOET have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEZ has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to JOET (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs JOET's -26.58%.
On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 9.44% vs 3.14% for PEZ. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.
JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.
PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while JOET is Quality Factor. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.29% for JOET.
JOET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEZ and JOET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer