PEX vs. QQQ
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.62%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
PEX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 4.62%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
PEX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.80% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and QQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PEX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEX vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
QQQ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PEX
QQQ
Industrials
PEX
QQQ
Healthcare
PEX
QQQ
Basic Materials
PEX
QQQ
Communication Services
PEX
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
QQQ
Energy
PEX
-
QQQ
Real Estate
PEX
-
QQQ
Technology
PEX
-
QQQ
Utilities
PEX
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
QQQ
PEX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.35 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.93 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 10.86 | -11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -82.97% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -11.96% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -22.77% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -35.12% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -35.12% | -14.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.09% | -4.25% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -32.73% | +24.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 3.22% | +9.84% |
Volatility
PEX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) is 5.26%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that PEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 9.17% | -3.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 14.57% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 17.96% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 22.69% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.42% | -3.12% |
PEX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.01% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to PEX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 4.62% for PEX. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PEX has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
PEX is categorized as Financials Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer