PDFS vs. NVO

In the year-to-date period, PDFS achieves a -34.64% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -15.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PDFS has underperformed NVO with an annualized return of 0.77%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PDFS Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is comparable to the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDFS and NVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PDFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.

The maximum PDFS drawdown since its inception was -95.46%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -71.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDFS and NVO.

PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) have volatilities of 13.52% and 13.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PDF Solutions, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.