PCTY vs. INTU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) and Intuit Inc. (INTU).

Performance

PCTY vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCTY vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation	-29.15%	-23.55%	21.00%	-15.14%	-17.74%	14.69%	70.43%	100.66%	27.67%	57.15%
INTU Intuit Inc.	-34.61%	6.09%	1.16%	61.76%	-39.12%	70.27%	46.12%	34.11%	25.86%	39.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PCTY : $5.98B INTU : $121.50B
EPS PCTY : $4.27 INTU : $15.42
PE Ratio PCTY : 25.31 INTU : 28.04
PEG Ratio PCTY : 0.74 INTU : 1.68
PS Ratio PCTY : 3.59 INTU : 6.05
PB Ratio PCTY : 5.44 INTU : 6.38
Total Revenue (TTM) PCTY : $1.68B INTU : $20.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) PCTY : $1.16B INTU : $16.34B
EBITDA (TTM) PCTY : $390.77M INTU : $5.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCTY achieves a -29.15% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -34.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PCTY has underperformed INTU with an annualized return of 12.63%, while INTU has yielded a comparatively higher 16.13% annualized return.

PCTY

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -29.15%
• 6M: -32.17%
• 1Y: -42.33%
• 3Y*: -18.39%
• 5Y*: -10.10%
• 10Y*: 12.63%

INTU

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: -34.61%
• 6M: -36.45%
• 1Y: -29.10%
• 3Y*: -0.37%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PCTY vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCTY

PCTY Risk / Return Rank: 5
PCTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PCTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PCTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PCTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
PCTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

INTU

INTU Risk / Return Rank: 16
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCTY vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCTY	INTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	-0.81	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.87	-1.02	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	0.87	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	-0.49	-0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	-1.17	-0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCTY vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCTY and INTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCTY	INTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	-0.81	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.07	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.50	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.38	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between PCTY and INTU is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PCTY vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

PCTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCTY Paylocity Holding Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INTU Intuit Inc.	1.04%	0.65%	0.60%	0.52%	0.72%	0.38%	0.57%	0.74%	0.83%	0.89%	1.08%	1.09%

Drawdowns

PCTY vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCTY drawdown since its inception was -66.66%, smaller than the maximum INTU drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCTY and INTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCTY	INTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.66%	-75.29%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.29%	-55.41%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.66%	-55.41%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.66%	-55.41%	-11.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.66%	-46.25%	-18.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.98%	-23.96%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.61%	23.43%	+1.18%

Volatility

PCTY vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is 12.57%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that PCTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCTY	INTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.57%	13.30%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.74%	28.96%	-1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.71%	36.12%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.05%	35.09%	+4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.68%	32.53%	+9.15%

Financials

PCTY vs. INTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paylocity Holding Corporation and Intuit Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PCTY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paylocity Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 282.14M and revenue of 416.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.8%.

INTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.67B and revenue of 4.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.9%.

PCTY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paylocity Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 70.38M and revenue of 416.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

INTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

PCTY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paylocity Holding Corporation reported a net income of 50.20M and revenue of 416.13M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

INTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 4.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.