PCT.L vs. PRGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000.
Performance
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT.L Polar Capital Technology Trust | 9.05% | 33.14% | 34.30% | 50.52% | -36.80% | 18.35% | 45.33% | 43.66% | -2.90% | 34.32% |
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -1.15% | 18.21% | 35.45% | 48.13% | -50.25% | 9.88% | 70.60% | 29.11% | -4.74% | 34.37% |
Different Trading Currencies
PCT.L is traded in GBp, while PRGTX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRGTX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCT.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than PRGTX's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PCT.L has outperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 24.14%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.46% annualized return.
PCT.L
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 73.29%
- 3Y*
- 36.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.14%
PRGTX
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCT.L vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank
PCT.L
PRGTX
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCT.L | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | 1.28 | +1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | 1.85 | +1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.26 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.28 | 2.69 | +4.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.35 | 6.62 | +16.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCT.L | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 1.28 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.15 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | 0.60 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.68 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCT.L and PRGTX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison
Neither PCT.L nor PRGTX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCT.L Polar Capital Technology Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
Drawdowns
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCT.L drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than PRGTX's maximum drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT.L and PRGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCT.L | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -71.18% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -13.95% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.89% | -65.29% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.89% | -65.29% | +27.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -9.10% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -21.68% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 4.47% | -1.36% |
Volatility
PCT.L vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) is 8.64%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that PCT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCT.L | PRGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 9.15% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 17.60% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.68% | 28.04% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 30.35% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 27.65% | -3.23% |