PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCOR vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCOR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCOR achieves a -30.37% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return.


PCOR

1D
-3.89%
1M
-18.44%
YTD
-30.37%
6M
-33.29%
1Y
-24.78%
3Y*
-7.10%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-3.62%
1M
8.20%
YTD
15.15%
6M
19.59%
1Y
52.10%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
65.05%
10Y*
68.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCOR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCOR
Procore Technologies, Inc.
-30.37%-2.92%8.25%46.71%-41.00%-9.13%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
15.15%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%101.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PCOR and NVDA is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between PCOR and NVDA has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCOR:

$7.65B

NVDA:

$5.24T

EPS

PCOR:

-$0.51

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

PCOR:

5.56

NVDA:

20.72

PB Ratio

PCOR:

6.37

NVDA:

26.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCOR:

$1.37B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCOR:

$1.09B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

PCOR:

$3.80M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCOR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCOR
PCOR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCOR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCORNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.26

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

2.59

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

6.36

-7.56

PCOR vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCOR and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCORNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.53

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

1.27

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.63

-0.84

Drawdowns

PCOR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCOR drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCOR and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCORNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.70%

-89.72%

+28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.22%

-20.21%

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.93%

-36.88%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.70%

-66.34%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.19%

-8.90%

-43.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.74%

-36.21%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.62%

8.21%

+12.41%

Volatility

PCOR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) has a higher volatility of 21.24% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that PCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCORNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.24%

12.53%

+8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.17%

25.54%

+13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.31%

34.22%

+14.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.29%

51.69%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.31%

49.80%

-0.49%

Dividends

PCOR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PCOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PCOR
Procore Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PCOR vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Procore Technologies, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
359.28M
81.62B
(PCOR) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PCOR vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Procore Technologies, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.1%
74.9%
Portfolio components
PCOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Procore Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 287.79M and revenue of 359.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.1%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

PCOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Procore Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.67M and revenue of 359.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

PCOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Procore Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -9.10M and revenue of 359.28M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PCOR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCOR has higher volatility (21.24%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCOR dropped -61.70% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCOR and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer