PCH vs. AMT
Compare and contrast key facts about PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) and American Tower Corporation (AMT).
Performance
PCH vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCH vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCH PotlatchDeltic Corporation | 4.90% | 5.86% | -16.71% | 16.06% | -22.61% | 33.11% | 20.19% | 42.63% | -28.74% | 23.74% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | -1.70% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
Fundamentals
PCH:
$3.25B
AMT:
$80.96B
PCH:
$0.82
AMT:
$5.40
PCH:
50.77
AMT:
31.99
PCH:
2.92
AMT:
7.60
PCH:
1.70
AMT:
22.17
PCH:
$1.12B
AMT:
$10.65B
PCH:
$175.22M
AMT:
$7.84B
PCH:
$197.29M
AMT:
$6.41B
Returns By Period
PCH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMT
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- -17.91%
- 3Y*
- -2.23%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCH vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
PCH
AMT
PCH vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCH | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.20 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between PCH and AMT is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCH vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
PCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than AMT's 3.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCH PotlatchDeltic Corporation | 3.24% | 4.52% | 4.59% | 3.67% | 6.18% | 9.42% | 3.22% | 3.70% | 16.25% | 3.06% | 3.60% | 4.96% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.94% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
PCH vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCH | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -98.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -34.82% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -26.99% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.20% | — |
Volatility
PCH vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCH | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 25.02% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.01% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.98% | — |
Financials
PCH vs. AMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PotlatchDeltic Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PCH vs. AMT - Profitability Comparison
PCH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PotlatchDeltic Corporation reported a gross profit of 57.05M and revenue of 314.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
AMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.
PCH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PotlatchDeltic Corporation reported an operating income of 35.06M and revenue of 314.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
AMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
PCH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PotlatchDeltic Corporation reported a net income of 25.89M and revenue of 314.18M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
AMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Tower Corporation reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.