PBT vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PBT or CRT.
Correlation
The correlation between PBT and CRT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PBT vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PBT:
-0.45
CRT:
-1.05
PBT:
-0.38
CRT:
-1.59
PBT:
0.95
CRT:
0.81
PBT:
-0.33
CRT:
-0.63
PBT:
-0.94
CRT:
-1.29
PBT:
20.86%
CRT:
32.65%
PBT:
43.80%
CRT:
40.19%
PBT:
-83.08%
CRT:
-83.46%
PBT:
-55.82%
CRT:
-62.17%
Fundamentals
PBT:
$561.17M
CRT:
$58.62M
PBT:
$0.78
CRT:
$1.13
PBT:
15.44
CRT:
8.65
PBT:
0.00
CRT:
0.00
PBT:
$37.74M
CRT:
$10.57M
PBT:
$37.74M
CRT:
$13.67M
PBT:
$36.27M
CRT:
$4.40M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBT achieves a -16.03% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PBT has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 8.35%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.
PBT
-16.03%
-18.91%
3.38%
-19.71%
29.07%
8.35%
CRT
-40.15%
-9.82%
-5.76%
-42.19%
15.69%
2.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PBT vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PBT vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
PBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than CRT's 10.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBT Permian Basin Royalty Trust | 5.61% | 4.30% | 4.56% | 2.28% | 7.10% | 10.83% | 11.20% | 7.09% | 5.40% | 6.82% | 10.73% | 6.75% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.47% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
PBT vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBT drawdown since its inception was -83.08%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBT and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PBT vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 7.95%. This indicates that PBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PBT vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Basin Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities