PortfoliosLab logo
PBT vs. CRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PBT and CRT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PBT vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBT:

-0.36

CRT:

-0.48

Sortino Ratio

PBT:

-0.20

CRT:

-0.46

Omega Ratio

PBT:

0.98

CRT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

PBT:

-0.20

CRT:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

PBT:

-0.69

CRT:

-0.80

Ulcer Index

PBT:

18.41%

CRT:

23.95%

Daily Std Dev

PBT:

39.54%

CRT:

40.79%

Max Drawdown

PBT:

-83.08%

CRT:

-83.46%

Current Drawdown

PBT:

-56.44%

CRT:

-58.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBT:

$511.30M

CRT:

$60.66M

EPS

PBT:

$0.55

CRT:

$0.95

PE Ratio

PBT:

19.95

CRT:

10.64

PEG Ratio

PBT:

0.00

CRT:

0.00

PS Ratio

PBT:

21.18

CRT:

9.16

PB Ratio

PBT:

3.11K

CRT:

24.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBT:

$21.07M

CRT:

$9.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBT:

$21.07M

CRT:

$7.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

PBT:

$19.92M

CRT:

$4.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBT achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PBT has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 8.67%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.23% annualized return.


PBT

YTD

-0.36%

1M

12.06%

6M

-13.43%

1Y

-14.23%

3Y*

-8.37%

5Y*

32.70%

10Y*

8.67%

CRT

YTD

8.25%

1M

1.18%

6M

7.16%

1Y

-19.53%

3Y*

-9.37%

5Y*

19.39%

10Y*

3.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Permian Basin Royalty Trust

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBT vs. CRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBT is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBT is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBT is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBT is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBT is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBT is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBT vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is comparable to the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBT and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PBT vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

PBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than CRT's 8.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
3.80%4.92%4.30%4.56%2.28%7.10%10.83%11.20%7.09%5.40%6.82%10.73%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
8.56%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.46%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%15.34%

Drawdowns

PBT vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBT drawdown since its inception was -83.08%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBT and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PBT vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 6.48%. This indicates that PBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PBT vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Basin Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M20212022202320242025
3.82M
4.36M
(PBT) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items