PBI vs. FSLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PBI or FSLR.
Key characteristics
| PBI | FSLR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 77.41% | 12.57% |
| 1Y Return | 99.17% | 46.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.58% | 19.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.18% | 30.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -6.79% | 14.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | 0.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.00 | 1.46 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.14 | 0.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.13 | 2.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.22% | 17.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 52.88% | 53.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.88% | -96.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.29% | -37.67% |
Fundamentals
| PBI | FSLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.36B | $20.76B |
| EPS | -$1.51 | $11.44 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.55 | 0.29 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.99B | $3.85B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.25B | $1.79B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $39.27M | $1.77B |
Correlation
The correlation between PBI and FSLR is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PBI vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PBI achieves a 77.41% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PBI has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of -6.79%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PBI vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PBI vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison
PBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc. | 2.64% | 4.55% | 5.26% | 3.02% | 3.25% | 4.96% | 12.72% | 6.73% | 4.95% | 3.64% | 3.09% | 4.03% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PBI vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBI drawdown since its inception was -92.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBI and FSLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PBI vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) is 11.12%, while First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a volatility of 16.17%. This indicates that PBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PBI vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pitney Bowes Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities