PBFDX vs. SMH

In the year-to-date period, PBFDX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PBFDX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 7.97%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.60% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PBFDX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PBFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFDX and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PBFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%, more than SMH's 0.43% yield.

The maximum PBFDX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFDX and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) is 7.18%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that PBFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.