PBF vs. VTLE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBF (PBF Energy Inc.) and VTLE (Vital Energy Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PBF in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing, VTLE in Oil & Gas E&P. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PBF vs. VTLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PBF

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: 59.20%
• 6M: 27.78%
• 1Y: 125.28%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 21.99%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

VTLE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBF vs. VTLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBF PBF Energy Inc.	59.20%	6.75%	-37.99%	9.97%	215.81%	82.68%	-77.12%	0.16%	-4.93%	33.64%
VTLE Vital Energy Inc.	0.00%	-42.04%	-32.03%	-11.53%	-14.49%	205.23%	-65.68%	-20.72%	-65.88%	-24.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PBF and VTLE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012	0.41

The correlation between PBF and VTLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PBF : $5.13B VTLE : $677.39M
EPS PBF : $3.74 VTLE : -$34.79
PS Ratio PBF : 0.17 VTLE : 0.36
PB Ratio PBF : 0.91 VTLE : 0.39
Total Revenue (TTM) PBF : $30.17B VTLE : $1.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) PBF : $127.70M VTLE : $839.10M
EBITDA (TTM) PBF : $812.40M VTLE : -$213.73M

Return for Risk

PBF vs. VTLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBF

PBF Risk / Return Rank: 83
PBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PBF Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PBF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBF vs. VTLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBF	VTLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBF	VTLE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PBF	VTLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.71%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.90%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBF	VTLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.37%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.56%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.22%	—	—

Dividends

PBF vs. VTLE - Dividend Comparison

PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBF PBF Energy Inc.	2.59%	4.06%	3.86%	1.93%	0.49%	0.00%	4.23%	3.83%	3.67%	3.39%	4.30%	3.26%
VTLE Vital Energy Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

PBF vs. VTLE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PBF Energy Inc. and Vital Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.50M and revenue of 7.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

VTLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 400.30M and revenue of 420.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.1%.

PBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 299.60M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

VTLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -362.37M and revenue of 420.83M, resulting in an operating margin of -86.1%.

PBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PBF Energy Inc. reported a net income of 198.30M and revenue of 7.90B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

VTLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Energy Inc. reported a net income of -353.52M and revenue of 420.83M, resulting in a net margin of -84.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBF and VTLE in my portfolio?

PBF and VTLE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.