PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PBF vs. TRGP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PBFTRGP
YTD Return-30.31%128.74%
1Y Return-30.64%134.02%
3Y Return (Ann)26.62%56.77%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.16%42.15%
10Y Return (Ann)3.76%10.84%
Sharpe Ratio-0.776.01
Sortino Ratio-0.996.51
Omega Ratio0.891.91
Calmar Ratio-0.5712.31
Martin Ratio-1.0545.95
Ulcer Index29.18%2.94%
Daily Std Dev39.89%22.46%
Max Drawdown-91.51%-95.21%
Current Drawdown-50.88%-0.33%

Fundamentals


PBFTRGP
Market Cap$3.55B$42.51B
EPS-$2.34$5.54
PEG Ratio2.511.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$34.90B$16.30B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$20.60M$3.75B
EBITDA (TTM)$209.10M$3.48B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PBF and TRGP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PBF vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a -30.31% return, which is significantly lower than TRGP's 128.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has underperformed TRGP with an annualized return of 3.76%, while TRGP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.84% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.94%
71.53%
PBF
TRGP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBF vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PBF, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PBF, currently valued at -0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PBF, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.89
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PBF, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PBF, currently valued at -1.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.05
TRGP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRGP, currently valued at 5.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRGP, currently valued at 6.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.006.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRGP, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRGP, currently valued at 12.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0012.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRGP, currently valued at 45.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0045.62

PBF vs. TRGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBF Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the TRGP Sharpe Ratio of 6.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBF and TRGP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.000.002.004.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.77
5.97
PBF
TRGP

Dividends

PBF vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison

PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than TRGP's 1.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
4.23%1.93%0.49%0.00%4.23%3.83%3.67%3.39%4.30%3.26%4.50%3.81%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.42%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%2.53%2.33%

Drawdowns

PBF vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and TRGP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-50.88%
-0.33%
PBF
TRGP

Volatility

PBF vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison

PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 13.38% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 7.73%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.38%
7.73%
PBF
TRGP

Financials

PBF vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items