PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBF vs. CVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PBF vs. CVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBF achieves a 59.20% return, which is significantly higher than CVI's 42.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PBF has underperformed CVI with an annualized return of 7.59%, while CVI has yielded a comparatively higher 20.29% annualized return.


PBF

1D
-1.44%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
59.20%
6M
27.78%
1Y
125.28%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
21.99%
10Y*
7.59%

CVI

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.14%
YTD
42.18%
6M
5.42%
1Y
52.30%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
31.66%
10Y*
20.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBF vs. CVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
59.20%6.75%-37.99%9.97%215.81%82.68%-77.12%0.16%-4.93%33.64%
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
42.18%51.83%-34.88%11.51%210.18%25.69%-61.31%25.44%-0.80%59.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PBF and CVI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012

0.69

The correlation between PBF and CVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PBF:

$5.13B

CVI:

$3.57B

EPS

PBF:

$3.74

CVI:

-$0.42

PS Ratio

PBF:

0.17

CVI:

0.48

PB Ratio

PBF:

0.91

CVI:

6.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

PBF:

$30.17B

CVI:

$7.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PBF:

$127.70M

CVI:

-$1.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

PBF:

$812.40M

CVI:

$441.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBF vs. CVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBF
PBF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CVI
CVI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBF vs. CVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFCVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

1.09

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

2.38

+5.74

PBF vs. CVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBF Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the CVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBF and CVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBFCVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.02

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.34

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.21

-0.10

Drawdowns

PBF vs. CVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBF drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CVI drawdown of -92.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBF and CVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFCVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-92.39%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.86%

-48.21%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.04%

-56.17%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.04%

-56.17%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.51%

-80.26%

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.71%

-9.60%

-16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-35.18%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

22.04%

-6.53%

Volatility

PBF vs. CVI - Volatility Comparison

PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) has a higher volatility of 17.21% compared to CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) at 14.58%. This indicates that PBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBFCVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.21%

14.58%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.21%

40.17%

+7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.37%

51.62%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.56%

58.18%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.22%

59.08%

+8.14%

Dividends

PBF vs. CVI - Dividend Comparison

PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than CVI's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
1.32%8.88%8.00%14.85%32.04%14.28%8.05%7.54%7.25%5.37%7.88%5.08%
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
2.59%4.06%3.86%1.93%0.49%0.00%4.23%3.83%3.67%3.39%4.30%3.26%

Financials

PBF vs. CVI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PBF Energy Inc. and CVR Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
7.90B
1.98B
(PBF) Total Revenue
(CVI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PBF and CVI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBF has higher volatility (17.21%) compared to CVI (14.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBF dropped -91.51% vs CVI's -92.39%.

PBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBF and CVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer