PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDC vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBDC vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBDC vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-9.87%-1.77%19.43%30.52%10.86%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
13.34%67.18%-0.58%46.25%1.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDC achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 13.34% return.


PBDC

1D
2.38%
1M
2.99%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*

URA

1D
6.93%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
13.34%
6M
6.44%
1Y
121.39%
3Y*
40.54%
5Y*
24.65%
10Y*
16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBDC vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDC has a 6.79% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBDC vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDC vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCURADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

2.48

-3.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.66

2.97

-3.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.37

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

4.21

-4.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

10.13

-11.42

PBDC vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDC and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCURADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.48

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.06

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between PBDC and URA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PBDC vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

PBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, more than URA's 4.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.69%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.30%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Drawdowns

PBDC vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDC and URA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-93.54%

+73.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.15%

-28.43%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-45.04%

+27.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-75.40%

+71.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

11.82%

-2.35%

Volatility

PBDC vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) is 6.16%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that PBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBDCURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

16.31%

-10.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

38.54%

-24.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

49.21%

-27.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

43.00%

-26.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

37.23%

-20.50%