PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDC vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBDC vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBDC vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-9.87%-1.77%19.43%30.52%10.86%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
39.85%5.93%8.52%-5.51%3.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDC achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 39.85% return.


PBDC

1D
2.38%
1M
2.99%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-1.01%
1M
24.23%
YTD
39.85%
6M
40.40%
1Y
41.63%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
17.93%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBDC vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDC has a 6.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBDC vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDC vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCGSGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

1.98

-2.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.66

2.66

-3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.36

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

3.70

-4.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

10.32

-11.61

PBDC vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDC and GSG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

1.98

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.09

+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between PBDC and GSG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PBDC vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

PBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.69%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PBDC vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDC and GSG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-89.62%

+69.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.15%

-11.91%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-57.78%

+40.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-63.77%

+59.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

4.27%

+5.20%

Volatility

PBDC vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) is 6.16%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that PBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBDCGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

11.08%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

16.24%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

21.16%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

21.97%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

21.78%

-5.05%