PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 6.75%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


PBD

1D
-0.26%
1M
-9.06%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
8.20%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
-8.16%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
-0.46%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$950.09K$971.83K$1.21M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

PBD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
8.20%43.65%-26.39%-10.69%-29.70%-22.30%145.46%40.00%-19.32%28.72%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and SCHD is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between PBD and SCHD has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PBD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBD
SCHD

Industrials

44.6%
7.8%

Technology

19.5%
12.7%

Utilities

16.9%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
7.7%

Energy

7.4%
14.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.2%

Financial Services

1.5%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
20.6%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Healthcare

-

20.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PBD
44.6%
SCHD
7.8%

Technology

PBD
19.5%
SCHD
12.7%

Utilities

PBD
16.9%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PBD
12.7%
SCHD
7.7%

Energy

PBD
7.4%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

PBD
4.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Financial Services

PBD
1.5%
SCHD
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

PBD
0.9%
SCHD
20.6%

Communication Services

PBD

-

SCHD
6.2%

Healthcare

PBD

-

SCHD
20.8%

Real Estate

PBD

-

SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

6.74

-5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

17.01

-12.51

PBD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-33.37%

-45.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.18%

-4.61%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.69%

-16.13%

-32.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.15%

-16.85%

-52.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.40%

-33.37%

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.36%

-1.24%

-51.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.34%

-3.30%

-50.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

1.82%

+5.31%

Volatility

PBD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

4.11%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.91%

8.11%

+12.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.04%

11.13%

+14.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.77%

14.39%

+14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

16.72%

+10.69%

PBD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.76%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBD has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 6.75% for PBD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.76% for PBD.

PBD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer