PBD vs. SCHD
PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBD returned 9.55%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PBD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 39.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.55%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
PBD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 39.81%
- 6M
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 96.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
PBD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 39.81% | 43.65% | -26.39% | -10.69% | -29.70% | -22.30% | 145.46% | 40.00% | -19.32% | 28.72% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBD and SCHD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PBD and SCHD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PBD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBD
SCHD
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PBD
SCHD
Energy
PBD
SCHD
Utilities
PBD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PBD
SCHD
Technology
PBD
SCHD
Basic Materials
PBD
SCHD
Financial Services
PBD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PBD
SCHD
Communication Services
PBD
-
SCHD
Healthcare
PBD
-
SCHD
Real Estate
PBD
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PBD
SCHD
PBD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.17 | 2.57 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.82 | 3.98 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.03 | 6.17 | +2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.22 | 15.20 | +13.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17 | 2.57 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.59 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.77 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.86 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
PBD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -33.37% | -45.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -4.61% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.45% | -16.13% | -36.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.15% | -16.85% | -52.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.40% | -33.37% | -42.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.44% | -1.40% | -37.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.40% | -3.32% | -50.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.87% | +1.56% |
Volatility
PBD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 2.92% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 7.66% | +9.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 10.96% | +12.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 14.38% | +13.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 16.72% | +10.54% |
PBD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.61% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBD has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 9.55% for PBD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.61% for PBD.
PBD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.06% for SCHD.
PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer