PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAX vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAX vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Patria Investments Limited (PAX) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAX achieves a -27.91% return, which is significantly lower than AB's 0.21% return.


PAX

1D
-3.87%
1M
-10.63%
YTD
-27.91%
6M
-24.79%
1Y
-8.10%
3Y*
-4.76%
5Y*
-3.54%
10Y*

AB

1D
-0.43%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
0.21%
6M
-5.97%
1Y
-0.56%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAX vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
-27.91%43.06%-20.01%18.86%-9.94%-15.01%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
0.21%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%46.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PAX and AB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021

0.34

The correlation between PAX and AB shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAX:

$1.77B

AB:

$3.41B

EPS

PAX:

$0.46

AB:

$3.22

PE Ratio

PAX:

24.31

AB:

11.45

PS Ratio

PAX:

4.37

AB:

14.25

PB Ratio

PAX:

2.94

AB:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAX:

$401.58M

AB:

$250.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAX:

$340.05M

AB:

$250.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAX:

$155.87M

AB:

$252.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAX vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAX
PAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAX vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patria Investments Limited (PAX) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

-0.03

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.19

0.12

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.04

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.47

-0.08

-0.39

PAX vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAX and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.03

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.16

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.46

-0.62

Drawdowns

PAX vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAX drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAX and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.17%

-87.65%

+41.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-14.68%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-22.27%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-45.76%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.88%

-9.90%

-24.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.10%

-26.22%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.14%

6.60%

+10.54%

Volatility

PAX vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

Patria Investments Limited (PAX) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.54%. This indicates that PAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.86%

4.54%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.92%

18.55%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.26%

22.40%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.31%

28.25%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.62%

32.39%

+0.23%

Dividends

PAX vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

PAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than AB's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.25%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
5.48%3.78%7.52%6.34%5.04%4.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PAX vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patria Investments Limited and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
98.20M
0
(PAX) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PAX and AB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAX has higher volatility (11.86%) compared to AB (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAX dropped -46.17% vs AB's -87.65%.

AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAX and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer