PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAX vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAX vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Patria Investments Limited (PAX) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAX achieves a -30.17% return, which is significantly lower than AB's -0.09% return.


PAX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-2.52%
6M
-24.05%
YTD
-30.17%
1Y
-15.05%
3Y*
-5.95%
5Y*
-1.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-6.93%

AB

1D
0.11%
1M
1.24%
6M
-9.62%
YTD
-0.09%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
14.60%
ALL TIME*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.20M$8.80M$11.34M
$12.76M$9.89M$10.93M

PAX vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
-30.17%43.06%-20.01%18.86%-9.94%-21.34%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-0.09%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%48.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PAX and AB is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAX:

$1.73B

AB:

$3.43B

EPS

PAX:

$0.46

AB:

$3.39

PE Ratio

PAX:

23.49

AB:

10.86

PS Ratio

PAX:

4.22

AB:

9.88

PB Ratio

PAX:

2.85

AB:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAX:

$401.58M

AB:

$343.43M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAX:

$340.05M

AB:

$343.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAX:

$155.87M

AB:

$343.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAX vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAX
PAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAX vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patria Investments Limited (PAX) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAXABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.00

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.13

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-0.25

-0.60

PAX vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAX and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAX vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAX drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAX and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.17%

-87.65%

+41.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.74%

-14.68%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.74%

-19.00%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-45.76%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.92%

-10.17%

-26.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-26.15%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.04%

7.31%

+14.73%

Volatility

PAX vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

Patria Investments Limited (PAX) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.49%. This indicates that PAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

4.49%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.98%

16.00%

+6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.44%

22.25%

+7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.27%

28.06%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.58%

32.31%

+0.27%

Dividends

PAX vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

PAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than AB's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.28%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
5.66%3.78%7.52%6.34%5.04%4.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PAX vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patria Investments Limited and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PAX vs. AB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Patria Investments Limited and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PAX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patria Investments Limited reported a gross profit of 78.20M and revenue of 98.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

AB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a gross profit of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PAX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patria Investments Limited reported an operating income of 25.60M and revenue of 98.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

AB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported an operating income of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

PAX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Patria Investments Limited reported a net income of 2.30M and revenue of 98.20M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

AB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a net income of 71.72M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in a net margin of 89.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAX and AB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to AB (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAX dropped -46.17% vs AB's -87.65%.

AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAX and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer