PATH vs. VOO
PATH (UiPath Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -31.78%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for VOO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PATH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -37.10% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.08% return.
PATH
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- -37.10%
- 6M
- -39.92%
- 1Y
- -17.59%
- 3Y*
- -13.14%
- 5Y*
- -31.78%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
PATH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | -37.10% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -34.15% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 16.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATH and VOO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PATH and VOO has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PATH
VOO
PATH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.51 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 11.16 | -11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PATH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.98% | -33.99% | -54.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.37% | -8.90% | -42.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.10% | -18.69% | -46.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.84% | -24.52% | -62.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.89% | -3.23% | -84.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.81% | -3.68% | -70.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.71% | 2.00% | +27.71% |
Volatility
PATH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.80%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 4.80% | +11.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.37% | 9.79% | +32.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.60% | 12.43% | +51.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.46% | 16.91% | +46.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.04% | 18.02% | +46.02% |
Dividends
PATH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PATH and VOO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to VOO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PATH and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer