PATH vs. VOO
PATH (UiPath Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -27.33%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for VOO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PATH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -26.60% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.72% return.
PATH
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 14.35%
- 6M
- -18.66%
- YTD
- -26.60%
- 1Y
- -2.98%
- 3Y*
- -13.29%
- 5Y*
- -27.33%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
PATH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | -26.60% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -34.15% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 16.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATH and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PATH and VOO has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PATH
VOO
PATH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.32 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.45 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 10.68 | -10.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PATH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.98% | -33.99% | -54.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.37% | -8.90% | -42.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.10% | -18.69% | -46.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.56% | -24.52% | -61.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.87% | -0.88% | -84.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.96% | -3.67% | -70.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.00% | 2.04% | +28.96% |
Volatility
PATH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.48%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | 3.48% | +8.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.18% | 9.98% | +30.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.07% | 12.52% | +51.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 16.92% | +46.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.86% | 17.99% | +45.87% |
Dividends
PATH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PATH and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to VOO (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PATH and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer