PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PARA vs. PAYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PARA vs. PAYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PARA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAYC

1D
-2.93%
1M
9.60%
YTD
-9.00%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
-43.91%
3Y*
-20.43%
5Y*
-14.27%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PARA vs. PAYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PARA
Paramount Global Class B
0.00%6.45%-27.96%-10.43%-41.80%-17.17%-7.58%-2.34%-24.86%-6.17%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
-9.00%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%70.82%116.22%52.43%76.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PARA and PAYC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2014

0.27

The correlation between PARA and PAYC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PARA:

$12.23B

PAYC:

$7.38B

EPS

PARA:

-$0.65

PAYC:

$8.58

PS Ratio

PARA:

0.37

PAYC:

3.77

PB Ratio

PARA:

1.05

PAYC:

9.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

PARA:

$28.89B

PAYC:

$2.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PARA:

$8.54B

PAYC:

$1.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

PARA:

$2.64B

PAYC:

$803.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PARA vs. PAYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PARA

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PARA vs. PAYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PARA vs. PAYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PARAPAYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Drawdowns

PARA vs. PAYC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PARAPAYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.32%

Volatility

PARA vs. PAYC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PARAPAYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.48%

Dividends

PARA vs. PAYC - Dividend Comparison

PARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than PAYC's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PARA
Paramount Global Class B
0.45%0.91%1.91%2.64%5.69%3.18%2.58%1.86%1.65%1.22%1.04%1.27%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
1.04%0.94%0.73%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PARA vs. PAYC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Global Class B and Paycom Software, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
8.15B
571.90M
(PARA) Total Revenue
(PAYC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PARA vs. PAYC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paramount Global Class B and Paycom Software, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
24.3%
84.7%
Portfolio components
PARA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported a gross profit of 1.98B and revenue of 8.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

PAYC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a gross profit of 484.60M and revenue of 571.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

PARA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 8.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

PAYC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported an operating income of 210.20M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

PARA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported a net income of -573.00M and revenue of 8.15B, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

PAYC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a net income of 155.70M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PARA and PAYC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PARA and PAYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer