PortfoliosLab logo
PARA vs. META
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PARA and META is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PARA vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PARA:

-0.20

META:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

PARA:

0.01

META:

1.26

Omega Ratio

PARA:

1.00

META:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

PARA:

-0.06

META:

0.79

Martin Ratio

PARA:

-0.37

META:

2.47

Ulcer Index

PARA:

15.46%

META:

10.93%

Daily Std Dev

PARA:

35.08%

META:

36.15%

Max Drawdown

PARA:

-90.05%

META:

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

PARA:

-86.80%

META:

-19.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PARA:

$8.28B

META:

$1.49T

EPS

PARA:

-$8.26

META:

$25.60

PEG Ratio

PARA:

0.63

META:

1.98

PS Ratio

PARA:

0.28

META:

8.83

PB Ratio

PARA:

0.48

META:

8.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

PARA:

$28.72B

META:

$170.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PARA:

$9.26B

META:

$139.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

PARA:

-$4.61B

META:

$86.47B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PARA achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than META's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PARA has underperformed META with an annualized return of -13.09%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


PARA

YTD

14.64%

1M

9.34%

6M

8.81%

1Y

-6.80%

5Y*

-5.48%

10Y*

-13.09%

META

YTD

1.28%

1M

8.46%

6M

0.71%

1Y

24.87%

5Y*

22.88%

10Y*

22.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PARA vs. META — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PARA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PARA is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PARA is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PARA is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PARA is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PARA is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PARA is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

META
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of META is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of META is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of META is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of META is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of META is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of META is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PARA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PARA Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PARA and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PARA vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than META's 0.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PARA
Paramount Global Class B
1.68%1.91%2.64%5.69%3.18%2.58%1.86%1.65%1.22%1.04%1.27%0.98%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.34%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PARA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PARA drawdown since its inception was -90.05%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PARA and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PARA vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Paramount Global Class B (PARA) is 7.59%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that PARA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PARA vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Global Class B and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
7.19B
42.31B
(PARA) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PARA vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paramount Global Class B and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
31.0%
82.1%
(PARA) Gross Margin
(META) Gross Margin
PARA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Paramount Global Class B reported a gross profit of 2.23B and revenue of 7.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.74B and revenue of 42.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.

PARA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Paramount Global Class B reported an operating income of 566.00M and revenue of 7.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.56B and revenue of 42.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

PARA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Paramount Global Class B reported a net income of 152.00M and revenue of 7.19B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 16.64B and revenue of 42.31B, resulting in a net margin of 39.3%.