PARA vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Performance

PARA vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PARA vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PARA Paramount Global Class B	0.00%	6.45%	-27.96%	-10.43%	-41.80%	-17.17%	-7.58%	-2.34%	-24.86%	-6.17%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PARA : $12.23B META : $1.47T
EPS PARA : -$0.65 META : $23.51
PS Ratio PARA : 0.37 META : 7.32
PB Ratio PARA : 1.05 META : 6.78
Total Revenue (TTM) PARA : $28.89B META : $200.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) PARA : $8.54B META : $164.79B
EBITDA (TTM) PARA : $2.64B META : $104.55B

Returns By Period

PARA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PARA vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PARA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Global Class B (PARA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PARA	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.55	—

Correlation

The correlation between PARA and META is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PARA vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PARA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PARA Paramount Global Class B	0.45%	0.91%	1.91%	2.64%	5.69%	3.18%	2.58%	1.86%	1.65%	1.22%	1.04%	1.27%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PARA	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-76.74%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-33.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.19%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PARA	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	39.91%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	43.77%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	38.46%	—

Financials

PARA vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paramount Global Class B and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PARA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported a gross profit of 1.98B and revenue of 8.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

PARA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 8.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

PARA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Global Class B reported a net income of -573.00M and revenue of 8.15B, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.