PortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. STZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and STZ is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PANW vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PANW:

0.87

STZ:

-0.90

Sortino Ratio

PANW:

1.18

STZ:

-1.06

Omega Ratio

PANW:

1.15

STZ:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

PANW:

0.93

STZ:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

PANW:

2.78

STZ:

-1.28

Ulcer Index

PANW:

8.98%

STZ:

20.17%

Daily Std Dev

PANW:

36.39%

STZ:

29.28%

Max Drawdown

PANW:

-47.98%

STZ:

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

PANW:

-7.61%

STZ:

-99.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PANW:

$128.31B

STZ:

$31.74B

EPS

PANW:

$1.73

STZ:

-$0.45

PEG Ratio

PANW:

2.39

STZ:

1.24

PS Ratio

PANW:

14.46

STZ:

3.11

PB Ratio

PANW:

17.75

STZ:

4.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANW:

$8.87B

STZ:

$7.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANW:

$6.53B

STZ:

$3.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

PANW:

$1.66B

STZ:

-$360.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 21.22%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.


PANW

YTD

5.75%

1M

2.51%

6M

-0.77%

1Y

30.49%

3Y*

31.93%

5Y*

37.46%

10Y*

21.22%

STZ

YTD

-18.40%

1M

-4.64%

6M

-25.15%

1Y

-27.32%

3Y*

-8.64%

5Y*

2.20%

10Y*

5.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PANW vs. STZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PANW is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PANW is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PANW is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PANW is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PANW is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PANW is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

STZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STZ is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STZ is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STZ is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STZ is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STZ is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STZ is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PANW vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PANW vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.27%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%

Drawdowns

PANW vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and STZ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PANW vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 6.73%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PANW vs. STZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.29B
2.16B
(PANW) Total Revenue
(STZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PANW vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20212022202320242025
72.9%
51.5%
(PANW) Gross Margin
(STZ) Gross Margin
PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.67B and revenue of 2.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.9%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 218.80M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -150.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 262.10M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -375.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.