PANW vs. STZ
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or STZ.
|5Y Return (Ann)||25.62%||4.65%|
|10Y Return (Ann)||31.68%||17.13%|
|Daily Std Dev||40.60%||21.50%|
|Gross Profit (TTM)||$3.78B||$4.71B|
The correlation between PANW and STZ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
PANW vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 68.01% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's 9.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 31.68%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 17.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
PANW vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
PANW vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
PANW vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown for the period was -19.51%, roughly equal to the maximum STZ drawdown of -16.11%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for PANW and STZ
PANW vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 3.42%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.