PANW vs. STZ

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than STZ's -16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 23.97%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.60% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and STZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) is 8.89%, while Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a volatility of 19.23%. This indicates that PANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.