PANW vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or MMC.
Key characteristics
| PANW | MMC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 68.01% | 16.22% |
| 1Y Return | 41.59% | 28.14% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 25.62% | 20.09% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 31.68% | 18.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.00 | 1.43 |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.60% | 19.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.98% | -67.46% |
Fundamentals
| PANW | MMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $72.35B | $94.00B |
| EPS | $1.32 | $6.58 |
| PE Ratio | 177.61 | 28.92 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.59 | 3.41 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.89B | $21.59B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.78B | $8.88B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $590.00M | $5.72B |
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and MMC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
PANW vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 68.01% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 16.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 31.68%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
PANW vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| TTM | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.30% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 2.14% | 1.93% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 3.20% |
PANW vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 1.00 | ||||
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.43 |
PANW vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown for the period was -19.51%, lower than the maximum MMC drawdown of -5.78%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for PANW and MMC
PANW vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.62%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.