PANW vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or MMC.
Key characteristics
| PANW | MMC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.36% | 6.81% |
| 1Y Return | 60.94% | 14.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 35.03% | 18.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 29.17% | 18.36% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 29.61% | 17.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.11 | 0.94 |
| Daily Std Dev | 47.86% | 14.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.98% | -67.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.04% | -3.00% |
Fundamentals
| PANW | MMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $89.73B | $99.73B |
| EPS | $6.47 | $7.87 |
| PE Ratio | 42.92 | 25.72 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.12 | 2.43 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.53B | $23.29B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.78B | $8.88B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $972.80M | $6.82B |
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and MMC is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PANW vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 29.61%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 17.35% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PANW vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PANW vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.41% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
PANW vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PANW vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 4.58%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PANW vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities