PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios

PANW vs. MMC

Last updated Sep 30, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or MMC.

Key characteristics


PANWMMC
YTD Return68.01%16.22%
1Y Return41.59%28.14%
5Y Return (Ann)25.62%20.09%
10Y Return (Ann)31.68%18.06%
Sharpe Ratio1.001.43
Daily Std Dev40.60%19.49%
Max Drawdown-47.98%-67.46%

Fundamentals


PANWMMC
Market Cap$72.35B$94.00B
EPS$1.32$6.58
PE Ratio177.6128.92
PEG Ratio1.593.41
Revenue (TTM)$6.89B$21.59B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.78B$8.88B
EBITDA (TTM)$590.00M$5.72B

Correlation

0.30
-1.001.00

The correlation between PANW and MMC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

PANW vs. MMC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 68.01% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 16.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 31.68%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
19.41%
13.66%
PANW
MMC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

PANW vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.


TTM20222021202020192018201720162015201420132012
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.30%1.37%1.18%1.64%1.65%2.14%1.93%2.16%2.44%2.17%2.37%3.20%

PANW vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
1.00
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.43

PANW vs. MMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the MMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PANW and MMC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.00
1.43
PANW
MMC

PANW vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown for the period was -19.51%, lower than the maximum MMC drawdown of -5.78%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for PANW and MMC


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-9.09%
-4.16%
PANW
MMC

PANW vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.62%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.78%
3.62%
PANW
MMC