PANW vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and MMC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PANW vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PANW:
0.63
MMC:
1.43
PANW:
1.06
MMC:
1.96
PANW:
1.13
MMC:
1.25
PANW:
0.69
MMC:
1.90
PANW:
3.00
MMC:
5.37
PANW:
6.87%
MMC:
3.76%
PANW:
32.43%
MMC:
14.12%
PANW:
-47.98%
MMC:
-67.46%
PANW:
-17.75%
MMC:
-0.01%
Fundamentals
PANW:
$113.42B
MMC:
$120.27B
PANW:
$1.77
MMC:
$8.17
PANW:
96.79
MMC:
29.87
PANW:
2.37
MMC:
2.59
PANW:
$8.57B
MMC:
$17.99B
PANW:
$6.33B
MMC:
$11.09B
PANW:
$1.52B
MMC:
$4.78B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 21.96%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 17.81% annualized return.
PANW
-5.85%
-10.04%
4.05%
22.62%
44.29%
21.96%
MMC
15.30%
2.59%
10.33%
21.44%
26.14%
17.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PANW vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PANW
MMC
PANW vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PANW vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
PANW vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PANW vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.81%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PANW vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities