PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PANW vs. MMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PANW vs. MMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2,085.21%
761.52%
PANW
MMC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 31.24% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 26.75%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.85% annualized return.


PANW

YTD

31.24%

1M

3.69%

6M

21.76%

1Y

59.72%

5Y (annualized)

36.35%

10Y (annualized)

26.75%

MMC

YTD

18.96%

1M

-2.53%

6M

6.59%

1Y

13.65%

5Y (annualized)

17.85%

10Y (annualized)

16.85%

Fundamentals


PANWMMC
Market Cap$130.25B$110.59B
EPS$7.29$8.11
PE Ratio54.6027.76
PEG Ratio2.892.39
Total Revenue (TTM)$6.15B$23.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.56B$10.31B
EBITDA (TTM)$866.40M$6.95B

Key characteristics


PANWMMC
Sharpe Ratio1.161.04
Sortino Ratio1.491.39
Omega Ratio1.271.20
Calmar Ratio1.671.88
Martin Ratio3.525.39
Ulcer Index14.53%2.84%
Daily Std Dev43.95%14.64%
Max Drawdown-47.98%-67.46%
Current Drawdown-3.82%-3.83%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PANW and MMC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PANW vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.161.04
The chart of Sortino ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.491.39
The chart of Omega ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.271.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.671.88
The chart of Martin ratio for PANW, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.525.39
PANW
MMC

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the MMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and MMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.600.801.001.201.401.60JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.16
1.04
PANW
MMC

Dividends

PANW vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.37%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%1.99%

Drawdowns

PANW vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.82%
-3.83%
PANW
MMC

Volatility

PANW vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.57%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.81%
3.57%
PANW
MMC

Financials

PANW vs. MMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items