PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios

PANW vs. CVNA

Last updated Sep 30, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Carvana Co. (CVNA).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PANW or CVNA.

Key characteristics


PANWCVNA
YTD Return68.01%785.65%
1Y Return41.59%94.62%
5Y Return (Ann)25.62%-6.62%
10Y Return (Ann)31.68%17.40%
Sharpe Ratio1.000.32
Daily Std Dev40.60%176.26%
Max Drawdown-47.98%-98.99%

Fundamentals


PANWCVNA
Market Cap$72.35B$7.46B
EPS$1.32-$4.18
PE Ratio177.6148.41
PEG Ratio1.59-0.13
Revenue (TTM)$6.89B$11.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.78B$1.25B
EBITDA (TTM)$590.00M-$502.00M

Correlation

0.38
-1.001.00

The correlation between PANW and CVNA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

PANW vs. CVNA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 68.01% return, which is significantly lower than CVNA's 785.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed CVNA with an annualized return of 31.68%, while CVNA has yielded a comparatively lower 17.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
19.41%
351.91%
PANW
CVNA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Carvana Co.

PANW vs. CVNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither PANW nor CVNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

PANW vs. CVNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Carvana Co. (CVNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
1.00
CVNA
Carvana Co.
0.32

PANW vs. CVNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the CVNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PANW and CVNA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.00
0.32
PANW
CVNA

PANW vs. CVNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown for the period was -19.51%, higher than the maximum CVNA drawdown of -98.13%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for PANW and CVNA


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-9.09%
-88.66%
PANW
CVNA

PANW vs. CVNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) is 6.78%, while Carvana Co. (CVNA) has a volatility of 23.45%. This indicates that PANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.78%
23.45%
PANW
CVNA