PortfoliosLab logo
PANL vs. SLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PANL and SLG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PANL vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PANL:

-0.97

SLG:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

PANL:

-1.30

SLG:

0.95

Omega Ratio

PANL:

0.85

SLG:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

PANL:

-0.70

SLG:

0.46

Martin Ratio

PANL:

-1.30

SLG:

1.12

Ulcer Index

PANL:

29.56%

SLG:

17.26%

Daily Std Dev

PANL:

43.62%

SLG:

36.53%

Max Drawdown

PANL:

-83.44%

SLG:

-94.02%

Current Drawdown

PANL:

-48.97%

SLG:

-28.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PANL:

$297.27M

SLG:

$4.37B

EPS

PANL:

$0.35

SLG:

-$0.42

PEG Ratio

PANL:

0.00

SLG:

0.95

PS Ratio

PANL:

0.54

SLG:

6.74

PB Ratio

PANL:

0.71

SLG:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANL:

$554.59M

SLG:

$938.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANL:

$74.89M

SLG:

$521.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

PANL:

$71.82M

SLG:

$426.66M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PANL having a -14.39% return and SLG slightly lower at -14.58%. Over the past 10 years, PANL has outperformed SLG with an annualized return of 5.55%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively lower -2.28% annualized return.


PANL

YTD

-14.39%

1M

11.66%

6M

-16.57%

1Y

-42.20%

3Y*

-7.20%

5Y*

22.13%

10Y*

5.55%

SLG

YTD

-14.58%

1M

8.39%

6M

-25.51%

1Y

16.01%

3Y*

4.92%

5Y*

13.71%

10Y*

-2.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.

SL Green Realty Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PANL vs. SLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PANL is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PANL is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PANL is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PANL is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PANL is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PANL is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PANL vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PANL Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANL and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PANL vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

PANL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than SLG's 5.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
6.67%7.46%4.85%5.83%3.31%0.00%3.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.81%4.43%7.15%10.95%8.48%7.81%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.76%

Drawdowns

PANL vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANL drawdown since its inception was -83.44%, smaller than the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANL and SLG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PANL vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) has a higher volatility of 18.54% compared to SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) at 9.30%. This indicates that PANL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PANL vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
122.80M
239.85M
(PANL) Total Revenue
(SLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PANL vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. and SL Green Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
16.4%
49.5%
(PANL) Gross Margin
(SLG) Gross Margin
PANL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 20.12M and revenue of 122.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

PANL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.93M and revenue of 122.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

PANL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported a net income of -1.98M and revenue of 122.80M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.