PANL vs. EBF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PANL (Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.) and EBF (Ennis, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PANL in Marine Shipping, EBF in Business Equipment & Supplies. Over the past 10 years, PANL returned 15.99%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for EBF. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PANL vs. EBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANL achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 18.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PANL has outperformed EBF with an annualized return of 15.99%, while EBF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.

PANL

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 16.22%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 85.60%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: 20.53%
• 10Y*: 15.99%

EBF

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 6M: 20.79%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: 9.67%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANL vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.	16.22%	34.57%	-31.14%	70.59%	44.19%	40.77%	-6.10%	0.50%	-17.66%	8.24%
EBF Ennis, Inc.	18.04%	-9.96%	12.59%	3.64%	19.38%	14.78%	-13.46%	17.54%	-2.77%	24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PANL and EBF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2013	0.16

The correlation between PANL and EBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS PANL : $0.54 EBF : $2.44
PE Ratio PANL : 14.71 EBF : 8.48
PS Ratio PANL : 0.75 EBF : 1.22
Total Revenue (TTM) PANL : $679.82M EBF : $296.04M
Gross Profit (TTM) PANL : $48.89M EBF : $92.28M
EBITDA (TTM) PANL : $116.02M EBF : $75.72M

Return for Risk

PANL vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANL

PANL Risk / Return Rank: 82
PANL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PANL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PANL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PANL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PANL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EBF

EBF Risk / Return Rank: 64
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANL vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PANL	EBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	0.84	+0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	1.23	+1.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.16	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.50	+1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	3.58	+3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PANL vs. EBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the EBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANL and EBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PANL	EBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	0.84	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.33	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.30	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.19	-0.17

Drawdowns

PANL vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANL drawdown since its inception was -83.44%, which is greater than EBF's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANL and EBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PANL	EBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.44%	-73.10%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.59%	-11.41%	-16.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.76%	-22.80%	-31.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.76%	-22.80%	-31.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.73%	-35.32%	-30.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.95%	-6.24%	-8.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	-20.58%	-30.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.14%	4.77%	+6.37%

Volatility

PANL vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison

Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 5.52%. This indicates that PANL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PANL	EBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.23%	5.52%	+12.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.45%	16.11%	+21.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.97%	21.84%	+27.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.80%	21.36%	+25.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.72%	26.25%	+28.47%

Dividends

PANL vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison

PANL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than EBF's 4.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBF Ennis, Inc.	4.82%	5.55%	16.60%	4.56%	4.51%	4.86%	5.04%	4.16%	4.94%	3.61%	11.67%	3.64%
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.	2.53%	3.63%	7.46%	4.85%	5.83%	3.31%	0.00%	3.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PANL and EBF in my portfolio?

PANL and EBF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PANL or EBF?

PANL has higher volatility (18.23%) compared to EBF (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANL dropped -83.44% vs EBF's -73.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PANL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.