PANL vs. EBF
PANL (Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.) and EBF (Ennis, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PANL in Marine Shipping, EBF in Business Equipment & Supplies. Over the past 10 years, PANL returned 15.65%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for EBF. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PANL vs. EBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PANL achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 25.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PANL has outperformed EBF with an annualized return of 15.65%, while EBF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
PANL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 15.30%
- 6M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 70.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.52%
EBF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 25.62%
- 1Y
- 30.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EBF Ennis, Inc. | $2.25M | $2.62M | $3.13M |
| $2.47M | $2.59M | $4.25M |
PANL vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. | 11.95% | 34.57% | -31.14% | 70.59% | 44.19% | 40.77% | -6.10% | 0.50% | -17.66% | 8.24% |
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 25.62% | -9.96% | 12.59% | 3.64% | 19.38% | 14.78% | -13.46% | 17.54% | -2.77% | 24.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PANL and EBF is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2013 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
PANL:
$497.81M
EBF:
$551.50M
PANL:
$0.54
EBF:
$1.65
PANL:
14.20
EBF:
13.18
PANL:
0.72
EBF:
1.43
PANL:
1.12
EBF:
1.79
PANL:
$679.82M
EBF:
$393.82M
PANL:
$48.89M
EBF:
$121.26M
PANL:
$116.02M
EBF:
$71.61M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PANL vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank
PANL
EBF
PANL vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PANL | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.61 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 6.01 | -1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PANL vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANL drawdown since its inception was -83.44%, which is greater than EBF's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANL and EBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PANL | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.44% | -73.10% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -11.14% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.76% | -22.80% | -31.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.76% | -22.80% | -31.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.73% | -35.32% | -30.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.07% | -0.50% | -17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.79% | -20.51% | -30.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.26% | 4.83% | +9.43% |
Volatility
PANL vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 4.91%. This indicates that PANL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PANL | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 4.91% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.07% | 17.21% | +17.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.77% | 22.28% | +27.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.22% | 21.50% | +24.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.37% | 26.07% | +28.30% |
Dividends
PANL vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison
PANL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than EBF's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 4.59% | 5.55% | 16.60% | 4.56% | 4.51% | 4.86% | 5.04% | 4.16% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 11.67% | 3.64% |
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. | 2.63% | 3.63% | 7.46% | 4.85% | 5.83% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PANL vs. EBF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PANL vs. EBF - Profitability Comparison
PANL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 170.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.08M and revenue of 98.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.
PANL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported an operating income of 10.47M and revenue of 170.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
EBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.59M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.
PANL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. reported a net income of 13.29M and revenue of 170.58M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
EBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 9.88M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PANL and EBF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PANL has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to EBF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANL dropped -83.44% vs EBF's -73.10%.
EBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PANL and EBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer