PAMC vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
PAMC and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both PAMC and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PAMC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAMC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 4.43% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 27.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
SCHG
PAMC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.76 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 3.71 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.76 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.57 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.79 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and SCHG is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAMC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.24% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -34.59% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -16.41% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -34.59% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -12.51% | +7.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -5.22% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 4.84% | -1.31% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 6.77% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 12.54% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 22.45% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 22.31% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 21.51% | -0.69% |