PAMC vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
PAMC and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both PAMC and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAMC or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and COWZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PAMC vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PAMC:
-0.18
COWZ:
-0.02
PAMC:
-0.20
COWZ:
0.09
PAMC:
0.97
COWZ:
1.01
PAMC:
-0.18
COWZ:
-0.03
PAMC:
-0.52
COWZ:
-0.09
PAMC:
9.18%
COWZ:
7.02%
PAMC:
20.27%
COWZ:
19.36%
PAMC:
-27.03%
COWZ:
-38.63%
PAMC:
-13.64%
COWZ:
-9.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's -2.47% return.
PAMC
-6.09%
8.94%
-9.46%
-3.56%
12.83%
N/A
N/A
COWZ
-2.47%
9.24%
-6.42%
-0.35%
7.25%
18.94%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAMC vs. COWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PAMC
COWZ
PAMC vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PAMC vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than COWZ's 1.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.03%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
PAMC vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 4.50%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...